October 25, 2025
Best FigJam Alternatives for Creative Teams

You love FigJam's simplicity for quick brainstorming sessions. But when you need to build detailed moodboards, organize complex research, or create truly visual thinking spaces, it feels limiting.
FigJam excels at collaborative sticky notes and basic diagrams. But what happens when your creative work needs more depth? When you're drowning in browser tabs while trying to collect inspiration? When manual organization becomes the bottleneck instead of the breakthrough?
Whether you're a designer creating moodboards, a researcher synthesizing findings, or a team planning strategy, you need a collaborative whiteboard that matches how your brain actually works.
After researching dozens of FigJam alternatives, we've found 14 tools that deliver different strengths for different needs. From AI-powered spatial canvases to enterprise collaboration platforms, here's what actually works.
TL;DR: Top 5 FigJam Alternatives
Tool | Best For | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|
Kosmik | Visual thinking and creative workflows | AI-powered spatial canvas with built-in browser |
Miro | Large team collaboration | 160+ integrations and 5,000+ templates |
Mural | Workshop facilitation | Expert facilitation tools and curated templates |
Lucidspark | Diagram-heavy workflows | Seamless Lucidchart integration |
Conceptboard | Budget-conscious teams | Built-in video conferencing and affordable pricing |
Start with Kosmik to create visual thinking spaces that match how your brain actually works.
Why Teams Are Switching from FigJam?
FigJam has earned its place as a popular collaborative whiteboard, but real user reviews reveal pain points driving this exploration.
1. Limited Depth for Complex Visual Work
FigJam shines for quick brainstorming sessions with sticky notes and basic shapes. But when you need deeper creative exploration, users hit walls.
Creative professionals need more than basic sticky notes for moodboarding, research synthesis, and visual knowledge management.
If you're building mood boards, organizing complex research, or creating visual knowledge bases, FigJam's simplicity becomes a constraint rather than a feature.
2. Pricing Concerns at Scale
FigJam requires a Figma subscription. Professional plans start at $12-16 per user monthly, bundled with design features many teams don't need.
For teams who only need whiteboarding without full Figma design capabilities, you're paying for features you won't use.
Three FigJam files on the free plan feels limiting when your team needs ongoing collaboration across multiple projects.
3. Feature Gaps for Specific Workflows
User reviews consistently mention missing capabilities:
No offline work. Your team can't access boards without internet connectivity.
Limited mobile experience. The mobile app restricts features compared to desktop.
Basic templates. FigJam offers 100+ templates versus Miro's 5,000+ library.
Manual organization. No AI-powered tagging or automatic categorization means everything stays where you manually place it.
4. Integration Ecosystem Limitations
FigJam works beautifully within the Figma ecosystem. Outside it? Integration options feel limited compared to competitors.
With only 20+ integrations, teams using diverse tool stacks find themselves manually moving work between systems. Miro's 160+ integrations and ClickUp's native whiteboard integration offer tighter workflow connectivity.
5. Not Built for Individual Visual Thinking
FigJam focuses heavily on team collaboration. But what about individual researchers, designers, and knowledge workers who need personal thinking canvases?
The tool assumes you're always brainstorming with others. Solo visual thinkers need space for private moodboarding, research collection, and idea development before collaboration begins.
What to Look for in a FigJam Alternative?
Not all collaborative whiteboards solve the same problems. Here's what matters when choosing your FigJam alternative.
1. Canvas Flexibility and Visual Thinking Support
Your ideas don't fit neatly into boxes and lists. You need spatial freedom.
Look for infinite canvases that let you organize visually rather than hierarchically. Support for multiple content types matters - images, PDFs, web clips, videos, and notes should coexist naturally.
The best alternatives let you create visual connections between ideas, not just pile sticky notes on a board. Moodboarding capabilities separate basic collaboration tools from true visual thinking workspaces.
Why this matters: Visual thinkers need space that mirrors how their minds work - spatially, not linearly.
2. AI-Powered Organization and Intelligence
Manual tagging and organization doesn't scale when you're managing hundreds of research items.
Smart alternatives offer AI auto-tagging by themes, colors, and subjects. Intelligent search finds content based on visual similarity and semantic meaning, not just keywords. Automatic organization suggestions help you spot connections you might miss manually.
Why this matters: AI handles the busywork of organization, freeing you for actual creative thinking.
3. Zero Context Switching
Every time you switch from your whiteboard to a browser to grab a reference, you lose focus and flow.
Built-in browsing capabilities eliminate the constant app-switching that kills productivity. Web clipping directly to your canvas means research stays connected to your work.
The best tools become your complete workspace, not just another tab demanding attention.
Why this matters: Context switching costs your team 2+ hours weekly in lost productivity and broken flow states.
4. Rich Media and Content Integration
Modern work involves multiple content types. Your whiteboard should handle them all natively.
Look for tools supporting PDFs, images, videos, web pages, and documents without requiring separate apps or extensions. PDF annotation capabilities matter for researchers and designers working with reference materials.
Link previews and management features help you organize web research without drowning in browser tabs.
Why this matters: Using one tool instead of five reduces friction and keeps your thinking connected.
5. Solo and Team Flexibility
Not all work happens collaboratively from day one.
Strong alternatives support individual creative work and research before team collaboration begins. You need personal workspace features with optional collaboration, not forced team structures for every project.
Easy sharing without mandatory team setups respects how creative work actually happens - often solo initially, collaborative later.
Why this matters: Creativity starts individually before becoming collaborative. Your tool should support both modes equally well.
6. Pricing and Value for Money
Budget constraints are real, especially for smaller teams and freelancers.
Generous free tiers let you test thoroughly before committing. Transparent pricing with no forced bundling means you pay for what you actually need. Look for tools where features justify their cost.
Why this matters: The best tool is the one you can actually afford to use effectively.
14 Best FigJam Alternatives (Ranked)
We've ranked these alternatives based on specific strengths, user reviews, and real-world value. The top tools excel at particular use cases rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
1. Kosmik - Best FigJam Alternative For Moodboarding and Visual Thinking

Kosmik reimagines the digital whiteboard as a spatial canvas for thinking, not just collaboration. Unlike traditional whiteboards focused on sticky notes and diagrams, Kosmik builds specifically for visual knowledge workers who need to capture, organize, and connect ideas across multiple content types.
Whether you're building moodboards, synthesizing research findings, or planning content campaigns, Kosmik provides an infinite canvas where everything lives in one place. Web clippings, PDFs, images, notes, and links coexist in spatial layouts that mirror how your brain actually works.
AI-powered organization helps you make connections you might miss manually. Content suggestions keep your canvas organized without rigid folder structures. And the built-in browser means you can research without ever leaving your thinking space.
Key Features
Built-in browser (Press 'W') eliminates app-switching completely during research sessions
AI auto-tagging organizes content automatically by colors, themes, and subjects
Infinite spatial canvas lets you arrange ideas visually rather than in restrictive lists
Native multi-format support for PDFs (with OCR), images, videos, web clips, and documents
Visual connector system creates relationships between ideas on your canvas
Real-time collaboration when you're ready to work with others
Moodboarding tools purpose-built for designers and creative professionals
Chrome extension for quick web clipping directly to your universes
Pros
Built-in browser eliminates constant context switching between apps
AI visual similarity search discovers inspiration you'd never find manually
Native support for all file types without opening separate applications
Actually affordable compared to bundled tools requiring unused features
Generous free forever plan with unlimited boards and core AI features
Perfect for individual creative work before team collaboration begins
Connector system creates visual relationship maps between concepts
Clean, intuitive interface without overwhelming complexity
Cons
Newer platform with smaller user community than established players like Miro
Some enterprise features still in active development
Pricing
Rover (Free Forever): 1 workspace, up to 3 members, 10 guests, unlimited universes and items, 100 files (15MB max each), 50 AI requests monthly
Plus: $6.99/month (yearly) or $10.99/month - unlimited workspaces, members, files, and AI requests with priority support
Enterprise: Custom pricing for teams needing dedicated support and advanced security
Why Kosmik is the Best FigJam Alternative?
FigJam focuses on quick collaborative brainstorming with teams. Kosmik goes deeper for visual thinkers who need more than sticky notes.
The built-in browser transforms your workflow. Press 'W' and research directly on your canvas without losing context or switching apps. Every web page, PDF, and image lives where you're actually thinking, not scattered across browser tabs and folder systems.
AI auto-tagging removes the manual organization burden that becomes overwhelming in other tools. Your content organizes itself by themes, colors, and subjects automatically. Visual similarity search finds related inspiration you wouldn't discover through keyword searching alone.
For designers creating moodboards, researchers synthesizing findings, or content strategists planning campaigns, Kosmik provides the depth FigJam lacks. You get a true thinking canvas, not just a collaboration surface.
Get Started with Kosmik for Free.
Best For
Designers creating moodboards and collecting visual inspiration without app-switching chaos
UX researchers synthesizing findings across multiple sources in one visual space
Content strategists planning campaigns with all research and references spatially organized
Individual knowledge workers and creative professionals who think visually before collaborating
2. Miro - Best for Large Team Collaboration

Miro dominates as the heavyweight champion of team collaboration, trusted by over 50 million users globally. With extensive integration ecosystems, massive template libraries, and enterprise-grade features, Miro excels when you have large distributed teams working together in real-time on complex projects.
Key Features
5,000+ templates covering every use case from brainstorming to strategic planning
160+ integrations including Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, Asana, and Google Workspace
Multiple collaboration formats - whiteboards, docs, tables, diagrams, presentations all in one platform
Advanced facilitation tools like voting, timers, and session management for workshops
3,600+ diagramming shapes for technical and business visualization
Miro AI features including content generation and intelligent suggestions
Enterprise security controls with SSO, advanced permissions, and audit logs
Pros
Industry-leading integration ecosystem connects your entire tool stack seamlessly
Massive template library provides starting points for virtually any collaboration scenario
Proven at enterprise scale with Fortune 500 companies and teams of 1,000+ users
Strong community resources with active forums and extensive documentation
Robust mobile apps for iOS and Android with offline capabilities
Advanced workshop facilitation features for professional meeting leaders
Reliable performance even with very large boards and many concurrent users
Comprehensive admin controls and reporting for enterprise teams
Cons
Interface can feel overwhelming for small teams needing simple whiteboarding
Pricing adds up quickly at $8-16 per user monthly for teams
Performance occasionally lags with extremely large complex boards
Feature complexity represents overkill for straightforward brainstorming needs
Learning curve steeper than simpler alternatives like FigJam
Pricing
Free: 3 editable boards, 160+ integrations, 10 AI credits per team monthly
Starter: $8/month per user (annual) - unlimited boards, 25 AI credits per member, advanced collaboration tools
Business: $16/month per user (annual) - multiple workspaces, 50 AI credits per member, private boards, advanced security
Enterprise: Custom pricing for 30+ members - 100 AI credits per member, dedicated support, SSO, audit logs, advanced controls
Best For
Large organizations with 50+ users needing comprehensive collaboration infrastructure
Enterprise teams requiring extensive integrations with existing tool stacks
Agile and Scrum teams managing complex projects with multiple stakeholders
Workshop facilitators leading sessions with 10+ participants regularly
Companies needing robust security controls and administrative oversight
3. Mural - Best for Workshop Facilitation and Templates

Mural specializes in facilitated collaboration, making it the top choice for teams running structured workshops, design sprints, and strategic planning sessions. Curated template libraries and powerful facilitation features help guides lead productive collaborative sessions.
Key Features
300+ expert-designed templates curated specifically for facilitated workshops and design sprints
Facilitation superpowers including private mode, timers, voting tools, and dot voting for structured sessions
Outline view helps facilitators structure thinking and organize brainstorming outputs systematically
Template customization lets you create and save organization-specific workshop templates
Integration with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Zoom, and major collaboration platforms
Presentation mode transforms murals into shareable presentations for stakeholders
Real-time collaboration with live cursors and instant updates for remote teams
Pros
Best-in-class facilitation features designed specifically for workshop leaders and meeting facilitators
High-quality templates created by facilitation experts rather than user-generated content
Intuitive interface balances power features with usability better than Miro's complexity
Strong support for agile ceremonies like retrospectives and sprint planning sessions
Good balance between collaboration breadth and focused feature sets
Reliable performance with smooth interactions even during large workshop sessions
Excellent for design thinking methodologies and structured innovation processes
Cons
Expensive for smaller teams at $9.99-17.99 per user monthly
Fewer integrations than Miro's extensive ecosystem
Can experience performance lag with many simultaneous participants in complex murals
Very limited free plan allows only 1 editable mural
Smaller user community and fewer third-party resources than industry leaders
Pricing
Free: 1 mural (very limited functionality)
Team+: $9.99/month per user - unlimited murals, 50+ templates, facilitation tools, integrations
Business: $17.99/month per user - private rooms, advanced facilitation, custom branding, SSO
Enterprise: Custom pricing - dedicated support, advanced security, custom integrations, SLA guarantees
Best For
Professional facilitators leading structured workshops and design sprints regularly
Design sprint teams following formal methodologies like Google Ventures' five-day sprint
Strategic planning sessions requiring structured thinking frameworks and voting mechanisms
Remote workshop leaders needing robust tools for engaging distributed participants
Agile coaches running retrospectives, planning sessions, and team ceremonies
4. Lucidspark - Best for Diagram-Heavy Workflows

Lucidspark serves as the brainstorming counterpart to Lucidchart, making it ideal for teams needing seamless transitions from ideation to structured technical diagrams. The integration between the two products creates powerful workflows for process-oriented and technical teams.
Key Features
Seamless Lucidchart integration lets you convert brainstorming into formal diagrams with one click
AI-powered diagramming suggestions help organize unstructured ideas into visual frameworks
Tagging and grouping features categorize sticky notes and ideas systematically during sessions
Voting and prioritization tools help teams make decisions collaboratively during brainstorms
Commenting and feedback systems enable asynchronous collaboration after live sessions
Template library focused on structured thinking and process-oriented brainstorming
Breakout boards allow small group work within larger team sessions
Pros
Smooth workflow from freeform brainstorming to structured diagramming eliminates manual recreation
Good free tier provides basic functionality for individuals and small teams testing the platform
Clean, simple interface with lower learning curve than feature-heavy alternatives
Fast performance with responsive interactions even on complex boards
AI assistance helps organize chaotic brainstorming outputs into structured frameworks
Strong for technical teams familiar with Lucidchart's diagramming capabilities
Reliable uptime and stable performance across web and desktop platforms
Cons
Need both Lucidspark and Lucidchart subscriptions for complete workflow (separate costs)
Limited creative and visual customization compared to design-focused alternatives
Smaller template library than Miro or Mural's extensive collections
Less powerful for purely creative workflows like moodboarding or visual research
Fewer third-party integrations than established collaboration platform leaders
Pricing
Free: Basic features with limited boards for individuals testing the platform
Individual: $7.95/month flat rate - unlimited boards and full collaboration features
Team: $9/month per user - advanced features, team collaboration, admin controls
Enterprise: Custom pricing for organizations needing SSO, advanced security, dedicated support
Best For
Teams already using Lucidchart who need complementary brainstorming capabilities
Technical teams including engineers and IT professionals who frequently create process diagrams
Process-oriented brainstorming where ideas eventually become formal flowcharts and technical diagrams
Organizations needing structured thinking frameworks rather than freeform creativity
Teams transitioning from ideation to documentation requiring consistent visual language
5. Conceptboard - Best for Budget-Conscious Teams Needing Video Integration

Conceptboard combines affordable pricing with built-in video conferencing, making it an attractive all-in-one collaboration solution for teams on a budget. At just €5 per user monthly, you get unlimited boards and integrated video calls without needing separate meeting tools.
Key Features
Built-in video conferencing eliminates need for separate meeting tools during collaborative sessions
Affordable pricing at €5 per user monthly with unlimited boards on paid plans
150+ templates in English and German for international teams
Infinite canvas with standard whiteboarding features for visual collaboration
Facilitator tools including voting, timers, and structured brainstorming frameworks
Real-time collaboration with multiple users working simultaneously on boards
GDPR compliant with EU hosting for teams with data privacy requirements
Pros
Excellent value at €5 per user monthly makes it one of the most affordable options
Built-in video conferencing provides complete collaboration solution without additional tools
Unlimited boards on paid plans removes artificial restrictions on team creativity
Good 30-day free trial allows thorough evaluation before purchase commitment
Facilitator tools like voting and timers support structured brainstorming sessions
GDPR compliance and EU hosting available for teams with privacy requirements
Responsive customer support team
Cons
Smaller user community than global platforms like Miro provides fewer resources
Fewer third-party integrations than established international collaboration platforms
Interface feels less polished and modern compared to design-forward alternatives
Limited mobile app features compared to native iOS/Android capabilities of competitors
Template library smaller than Miro or Mural's extensive collections
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individuals testing the platform
Starter: €5/month per user - unlimited boards, 5GB storage, core collaboration features
Advanced: €10/month per user - unlimited projects, 1TB storage, SSO (additional cost), advanced features
Corporate and Government: €14/month per user - audit logs, unlimited storage, SLA guarantees, dedicated support
Best For
Budget-conscious small to medium teams seeking affordable whiteboarding with all-in-one features
Remote teams wanting integrated video conferencing without paying for separate meeting tools like Zoom
International teams needing multilingual support (English and German templates)
Teams requiring GDPR compliance and EU data hosting for regulatory reasons
Organizations seeking good value without sacrificing core collaboration functionality
6. Microsoft Whiteboard - Best for Microsoft 365 Teams

Microsoft Whiteboard offers seamless integration for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem. Included with Microsoft 365 subscriptions at no additional cost, it provides basic whiteboarding capabilities with deep Teams and Office integration.
Key Features
Native Microsoft Teams integration launches whiteboards directly in team meetings and channels
Included with Microsoft 365 subscriptions requires no additional whiteboard tool budget
OneDrive storage integration keeps whiteboards within existing Microsoft cloud infrastructure
Surface and tablet optimization with pen support for hardware Microsoft customers already own
Real-time collaboration with familiar Microsoft UX patterns and interaction models
Basic template library covering common brainstorming and planning scenarios
Azure security infrastructure inherits Microsoft's enterprise-grade security and compliance
Pros
Free with Microsoft 365 subscriptions eliminates separate whiteboard tool costs
Seamless Teams integration makes launching collaborative sessions effortless during meetings
Great for hybrid meetings where in-office and remote participants collaborate simultaneously
Works exceptionally well on Surface devices with pen and touch input
Familiar Microsoft user experience reduces learning curve for Office users
Inherits Microsoft 365 security controls and compliance certifications automatically
Simple interface good for basic brainstorming without feature complexity
Cons
Limited features compared to dedicated whiteboarding platforms like Miro or Mural
Requires Microsoft ecosystem lock-in rather than working across diverse tool stacks
Basic template library lacks depth for specialized facilitation or design thinking sessions
Less powerful for complex visual collaboration or creative workflows
Feature development slower than specialized whiteboard competitors
Export and integration options limited outside Microsoft ecosystem
Pricing
Free with Microsoft 365 subscription (no standalone pricing available)
Microsoft 365 Business Basic: ~$6/user/month includes Whiteboard
Microsoft 365 Business Standard: ~$12.50/user/month includes Whiteboard
Best For
Microsoft 365 organizations wanting to consolidate tools within existing ecosystem
Teams already using Microsoft Teams for communication and meetings daily
Surface device users taking advantage of pen and touch hardware capabilities
Budget-conscious Microsoft customers needing basic whiteboarding without additional costs
Organizations prioritizing Microsoft's security and compliance infrastructure for collaborative tools
7. Whimsical - Best for Speed and Simplicity

Whimsical combines docs, flowcharts, wireframes, and mind maps in one fast, keyboard-friendly interface. Perfect for teams valuing speed and minimal learning curves over extensive feature sets.
Key Features
Multiple doc types in one unified tool including whiteboards, diagrams, docs, and wireframes
Keyboard shortcuts everywhere enable power users to work at speed without mouse dependence
Blazing fast performance with minimal loading times and responsive interactions
Clean, minimal interface reduces visual clutter and cognitive overhead during creative work
Unified workspace keeps all project types in one place without tool switching
Real-time collaboration for team brainstorming and co-creation sessions
Simple sharing and permissions make collaboration straightforward without complex setup
Pros
Blazing fast performance makes it the quickest whiteboard tool for rapid ideation
Keyboard-first design lets power users work at maximum speed without constant clicking
Simple learning curve gets teams productive immediately without extensive training
Multiple tools in one (whiteboards, diagrams, docs) consolidate workflows effectively
Affordable at $10 per user monthly for small teams with limited budgets
Clean interface reduces distraction and focuses attention on content creation
Great for product managers juggling multiple document types daily
Cons
Limited advanced collaboration features compared to enterprise platforms
Smaller template library than specialized alternatives like Mural
Fewer third-party integrations restricts workflow automation possibilities
Basic feature set may feel limiting for teams needing specialized facilitation tools
Smaller community means fewer resources and shared templates
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individual use and testing
Pro: $10/month per user - unlimited everything with full collaboration capabilities
Org: $20/month per user - centralized billing, priority support, advanced admin features
Best For
Small, fast-moving teams prioritizing speed over feature breadth in daily workflows
Individual product managers and developers who love keyboard shortcuts and efficiency
Teams wanting to consolidate multiple document types without learning separate specialized tools
Startups and small companies needing affordable all-in-one collaboration without enterprise complexity
Developers and technical teams comfortable with keyboard-driven interfaces for maximum productivity
8. Bluescape - Best for Large-Scale Enterprise Visual Collaboration

Bluescape handles massive, complex projects with extensive visual content across long timelines. Built for enterprise teams managing high-stakes initiatives requiring persistent workspaces and advanced collaboration capabilities for hundreds of stakeholders.
Key Features
Massive canvas capacity handles extremely large projects with thousands of objects without performance degradation
Persistent workspaces keep long-term projects organized across months or years
High-resolution media support maintains image quality for design and engineering applications
Advanced permissions and access controls provide granular security for sensitive collaborative work
Project management integrations connect to enterprise PM tools for workflow consistency
Desktop and mobile apps enable collaboration across devices and locations
Enterprise security certifications including FedRAMP and DoD IL4 for regulated industries
Pros
Handles very large complex projects other tools struggle to render effectively
Persistent workspaces ideal for long-term strategic planning and ongoing collaboration
High-quality visual rendering maintains fidelity for design and engineering precision
Advanced collaboration features support sophisticated multi-stakeholder workflows
Reliable performance even with hundreds of concurrent users on massive boards
Dedicated enterprise support with SLAs for mission-critical projects
Enterprise security certifications available for regulated industries
Cons
Expensive with enterprise-only pricing typically $10-15+ per user monthly minimum
Complex interface and features create overkill for simple brainstorming needs
Steep learning curve requires significant training investment for teams
Dramatically oversized for small teams or straightforward collaboration requirements
Smaller user community provides fewer readily available resources and templates
Pricing
Enterprise only: Contact sales for custom pricing
Typically starts at $10-15/user/month with minimum seat requirements for enterprise agreements
Best For
Large enterprises managing complex multi-month or multi-year projects requiring persistent collaboration spaces
Strategic planning teams coordinating hundreds of stakeholders across extended timelines
Design and engineering teams working with high-resolution visual assets at scale
Organizations needing advanced collaboration capabilities beyond standard whiteboard tools
Enterprise teams requiring dedicated support and SLAs for mission-critical visual collaboration projects
9. Creately - Best for Visual Diagramming

Creately combines whiteboarding with powerful diagramming capabilities, offering 1,000+ templates and smart connectors for technical and business visualization needs.
Key Features
1,000+ diagram templates covering flowcharts, org charts, network diagrams, and business processes
Smart connectors and shapes automatically align and organize diagram elements intelligently
Data integration capabilities connect diagrams to databases and spreadsheets for live updates
Real-time collaboration with team commenting and co-editing on complex diagrams
Multiple view types switch between whiteboard, diagram, and structured database views
Import from Visio and other tools enables migration from legacy diagramming software
Export to multiple formats including PNG, SVG, PDF for presentations and documentation
Pros
Extensive template library provides starting points for virtually any diagram type needed
Good for technical diagrams with engineering precision and structured frameworks
Affordable at $5 per user monthly makes it accessible for small technical teams
Intuitive interface balances power diagramming features with usability effectively
Data visualization features connect diagrams to live data sources dynamically
Strong for business process documentation and organizational chart creation
Collaborative features support team diagramming without complex setup
Cons
Can be slow with very large complex diagrams containing hundreds of objects
Limited creative whiteboarding features compared to design-focused alternatives
Fewer third-party integrations than established collaboration platform leaders
Mobile app has limitations compared to desktop functionality and features
Smaller community than industry leaders provides fewer shared resources
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individuals testing the platform
Personal: $5/month - unlimited diagrams and basic collaboration features
Team: $10/month per user - advanced collaboration, unlimited storage, priority support
Business: $89/month flat rate for unlimited users - advanced features, admin controls, integrations
Best For
Business analysts documenting processes and creating workflow diagrams regularly
Technical teams including system architects and database designers
Process documentation specialists creating flowcharts and procedure diagrams
Organizations creating and maintaining organizational charts and hierarchy visualizations
Teams needing both freeform whiteboarding and structured technical diagramming capabilities
10. ClickUp Whiteboards - Best for Project Management Integration

For teams already using ClickUp for project management, the built-in whiteboard feature creates seamless workflow from brainstorming directly to task execution without tool switching.
Key Features
Native ClickUp integration embeds whiteboards directly in project workspaces and tasks
Turn ideas into tasks instantly converts brainstorming outputs to actionable tasks with one click
Templates for PM workflows including sprint planning, roadmapping, and retrospectives
Embedded in project context keeps brainstorming connected to relevant projects and goals
Included with ClickUp subscription requires no additional whiteboard tool cost
Real-time collaboration with team members already in your ClickUp workspace
Link to docs, tasks, and goals creates connected workspace across all ClickUp features
Pros
Included with ClickUp subscription eliminates separate whiteboard tool costs completely
Direct task creation from brainstorming ideas streamlines workflow dramatically
Context within existing projects keeps collaborative work organized and connected
Growing feature set continues improving with regular ClickUp updates
No additional cost makes it zero-friction addition to ClickUp workflows
Familiar interface for teams already comfortable with ClickUp's UX patterns
Good for PM-focused brainstorming that leads directly to execution
Cons
Requires ClickUp subscription limits usefulness for non-ClickUp teams
Less mature than dedicated whiteboard tools with years of development
Limited advanced whiteboarding features compared to specialized platforms
Better suited for PM-oriented collaboration than pure creative whiteboarding
Smaller template library than dedicated whiteboard platforms
Pricing
Included with ClickUp plans ($7-12/user monthly depending on ClickUp tier)
No separate whiteboard pricing - part of overall ClickUp subscription
Best For
ClickUp users wanting to consolidate tools within existing platform completely
PM-focused teams where brainstorming leads directly to task creation and execution
Agile workflows requiring sprint planning and retrospective whiteboarding integrated with task management
Task-oriented brainstorming where ideas immediately convert to actionable work items
Teams prioritizing tight integration over specialized whiteboarding features
11. Stormboard - Best for Data-Driven Brainstorming

Stormboard focuses on turning brainstorming into actionable data with voting, reporting, and analytics features helping teams make decisions based on collective input and structured analysis.
Key Features
Advanced voting and polling features enable structured decision-making during brainstorming sessions
Reporting and analytics capabilities provide data insights from collaborative sessions
Template library focused on structured ideation and decision-making frameworks
Integration options with project management and communication tools
Data export capabilities move brainstorming outputs to spreadsheets and reports easily
Multi-session tracking follows ideas and decisions across multiple collaborative sessions
Sticky note automation organizes and categorizes ideas based on voting and input
Pros
Strong reporting features transform brainstorming into actionable data and insights
Data-driven decision making supported by analytics and voting mechanisms
Good for structured brainstorming sessions with clear decision objectives
Voting and prioritization tools help teams reach consensus systematically
Export capabilities move collaborative outputs to project management systems effectively
Useful for organizations requiring documentation and audit trails of decisions
Template library supports systematic innovation and idea generation processes
Cons
Less flexible than freeform creative whiteboarding tools for unstructured thinking
Requires more structured approach may feel constraining for creative exploration
Limited pure creative features compared to design-focused alternatives
Higher learning curve for teams unfamiliar with structured facilitation methods
Smaller user community provides fewer shared resources and best practices
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individuals testing the platform
Personal: $8/month per user - unlimited boards, voting, basic reporting
Business: $13/month per user - advanced analytics, integrations, priority support
Enterprise: Custom pricing for organizations needing dedicated support and advanced security
Best For
Decision-making workshops requiring structured voting and prioritization mechanisms
Prioritization sessions where teams need to reach consensus on competing ideas systematically
Teams needing analytics and reporting from collaborative brainstorming sessions
Structured brainstorming methodologies like design thinking and innovation frameworks
Organizations requiring documentation trails and data from ideation processes for governance
12. Explain Everything - Best for Educational Content

Explain Everything excels at creating recorded presentations and tutorials, making it ideal for educators, trainers, and teams explaining concepts visually with recorded walkthroughs.
Key Features
Screen recording and annotation capabilities capture explanations with visual markup
Voice recording integration adds narration to visual presentations seamlessly
Animation tools bring static content to life with movement and transitions
Educational templates designed specifically for teaching and learning scenarios
Video export creates shareable presentation files for asynchronous learning
Live collaboration enables real-time teaching and remote instruction sessions
Drawing and markup tools annotate content with pen, highlighter, and shapes
Pros
Perfect for teaching and training applications with recording capabilities built-in
Recording capabilities create reusable educational content and tutorials effectively
Animation features make complex concepts more engaging and understandable
Educational focus provides features specifically designed for learning contexts
Good for asynchronous learning where recorded explanations supplement live teaching
Intuitive tools for teachers without technical expertise in video production
Export options create content for learning management systems easily
Cons
Not ideal for general business collaboration outside educational contexts
Limited business-focused features compared to collaboration platforms
Focused primarily on education may feel limiting for broader use cases
Overkill for simple whiteboarding without recording needs
Pricing model targets educational institutions rather than business teams
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individuals testing the platform
Teacher: $34.99/year - full recording and collaboration features for individual educators
School: Contact for pricing - institutional licenses with admin controls
Best For
Teachers and educators creating recorded lessons and visual explanations for students
Training teams developing tutorial content and instructional materials for employees
Tutorial creation for software documentation and product education programs
Educational institutions needing collaborative teaching tools with recording capabilities
Corporate training departments creating reusable learning content and onboarding materials
13. Ziteboard - Best for Minimalist Sketching

Ziteboard offers clean, minimal whiteboard focused on sketching and drawing without feature complexity. Perfect for teams wanting simplicity without overwhelming options.
Key Features
Clean sketching interface provides distraction-free drawing and annotation space
Real-time collaboration enables multiple users to sketch simultaneously simply
Infinite canvas gives unlimited space for freeform sketching and diagramming
PDF import allows annotation of existing documents and materials
Simple sharing creates collaboration links without complex permission setup
Pen pressure support for drawing tablets and stylus input devices
No clutter interface focuses attention on content rather than features
Pros
Very simple and clean interface eliminates feature overwhelm completely
Fast performance with minimal loading and responsive sketch interactions
Good for basic sketching and freehand drawing without complexity
Free plan available for individuals and small teams testing the platform
No feature clutter keeps focus on creative sketching work
Minimal learning curve gets users productive within minutes
Good for math tutoring and simple diagramming with students
Cons
Limited features compared to full-featured whiteboard platforms
Basic template library provides minimal starting points for common scenarios
Fewer integrations with other productivity and collaboration tools
Small user community provides limited shared resources and support
Missing advanced collaboration features for complex team workflows
Pricing
Free: Basic features for individuals and simple use cases
Pro: $9/month per user - unlimited boards, advanced features, priority support
Best For
Simple sketching and freeform drawing without feature complexity getting in the way
Math tutoring requiring clean digital whiteboard for equations and diagrams
Basic brainstorming sessions with small teams needing minimal setup
Minimalists preferring simplicity and speed over extensive feature sets
Quick collaborative sketching without investment in learning complex platforms
14. Sketchboard - Best for Software Development Teams

Sketchboard caters specifically to software development teams with features for system architecture, user flows, and technical diagrams in a sketch-like aesthetic familiar to developers.
Key Features
Software-focused shapes library includes technical architecture and system diagram elements
GitHub integration connects diagrams to code repositories and development workflows
Technical diagramming tools support UML, ERD, and system architecture visualization
Sketch-style aesthetic provides hand-drawn look appealing to developer communities
Developer-friendly shortcuts enable keyboard-driven workflows familiar to coders
Real-time collaboration for pair diagramming and architecture discussions
Export to code generates code snippets from certain diagram types
Pros
Built specifically for developers with technical diagramming needs and workflows
GitHub integration connects visual architecture to actual code repositories seamlessly
Good for system architecture diagrams and technical documentation creation
Sketch aesthetic appeals to developer communities valuing substance over polish
Affordable at $4.90 per user monthly for small development teams
Keyboard shortcuts enable fast diagramming for keyboard-oriented developers
Designed for agile development workflows and iterative architecture discussions
Cons
Limited for general-purpose whiteboarding outside software development contexts
Niche tool serves developers primarily rather than broad collaboration needs
Smaller feature set compared to general whiteboard platforms
Less polished interface than design-focused alternatives like Miro
Smaller user community limits available shared templates and resources
Pricing
Free: Limited features for individuals testing the platform
Team: $4.90/month per user - unlimited boards, GitHub integration, collaboration features
Business: $9.90/month per user - advanced features, priority support, export options
Best For
Software development teams creating system architecture and technical diagrams regularly
System architects documenting microservices, APIs, and infrastructure visually
Technical documentation specialists creating developer-focused visual content
Developer workflows requiring tight integration with GitHub and code repositories
Agile development teams sketching technical solutions collaboratively during planning
Quick Comparison: FigJam Alternatives Side-by-Side
Here's how all 14 alternatives stack up across key dimensions for collaboration.
Tool | AI Features | Standout Feature | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
Kosmik | AI auto-tagging, visual similarity search, AI universe creation | Built-in browser eliminates app-switching | Visual thinking and moodboarding |
Miro | Content generation, smart suggestions (10-100 credits) | 160+ integrations and 5,000+ templates | Large team collaboration |
Mural | Limited AI features | Expert facilitation tools and curated templates | Workshop facilitation |
Lucidspark | AI diagramming suggestions | Seamless Lucidchart integration | Diagram-heavy workflows |
Conceptboard | None | Built-in video conferencing and €5 pricing | Budget teams, video integration |
MS Whiteboard | None | Native Teams integration | Microsoft 365 organizations |
Whimsical | None | Blazing fast keyboard-first interface | Speed and simplicity |
Bluescape | None | Massive canvas for long-term projects | Large-scale enterprise collaboration |
Creately | Limited | 1,000+ diagram templates | Visual diagramming |
ClickUp | None | Direct task creation from ideas | Project management integration |
Stormboard | None | Advanced voting and analytics | Data-driven decisions |
Explain Everything | None | Screen recording and tutorial creation | Educational content |
Ziteboard | None | Minimalist sketching interface | Simple sketching |
Sketchboard | None | GitHub integration for developers | Software development teams |
Top 5 FigJam Alternatives: Detailed Feature Comparison
Here's an in-depth comparison of the top 5 FigJam alternatives across key features and capabilities.
Feature | Kosmik | Miro | Mural | Lucidspark | Conceptboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AI Features | Yes - Auto-tagging, visual search | Yes - Limited (10-100 credits) | No | Yes - Diagramming AI | No |
Built-in Browser | Yes - Press 'W' | No | No | No | No |
Templates | Growing library | 5,000+ | 300+ expert-designed | Moderate selection | 150+ (EN/DE) |
Integrations | Core set (focused) | 160+ apps | 60+ apps | 40+ apps | 50+ apps |
Free Plan | Unlimited boards | 3 editable boards | 1 mural only | Limited features | Very limited |
Starting Price | $6.99/mo (annual) | $8/mo | $9.99/mo | $7.95/mo | €5/mo |
Best Free Tier | Yes - Most generous | Limited boards | Very restrictive | Basic features | Very basic |
Mobile Apps | iOS/Android developing | Yes - Full iOS/Android | Yes - iOS/Android | Yes - iOS/Android | Limited mobile |
Offline Access | Coming soon | Yes - Limited | Yes - Limited | Yes - Limited | No |
Best For Use Case | Visual thinking and moodboarding | Enterprise teams (50+ users) | Workshop facilitation | Technical diagrams | Budget teams with video needs |
Key Takeaways from This Comparison
For Free Plans
Kosmik wins with unlimited boards and AI features. Miro's 3-board limit and Mural's 1-mural restriction make them impractical for free long-term use.
For AI Innovation
Kosmik and Lucidspark lead with AI auto-tagging and diagramming assistance. Miro offers limited AI. Mural and Conceptboard have no AI features.
For Integrations
Miro dominates with 160+ integrations if your team needs extensive tool connectivity. Kosmik focuses on core integrations without overwhelming options.
For Budget and Video Integration
Conceptboard delivers excellent value at €5/month with built-in video conferencing, eliminating the need for separate meeting tools.
For Templates
Miro's 5,000+ templates beat all competitors. Mural's 300+ expert-designed templates emphasize quality over quantity. Kosmik's growing library focuses on creative workflows.
How to Choose the Right FigJam Alternative for Your Team?
With 14 strong alternatives, choosing depends on matching your specific needs and workflows to the right tool strengths.
Decision Framework: Match Your Needs to the Right Tool
For Individual Creative Work and Visual Thinking
Choose Kosmik when you need more than basic team collaboration. Visual research, moodboarding, and knowledge management with AI-powered organization work best here. Perfect for working solo or in small creative teams where individual thinking happens before group collaboration.
For Large-Scale Team Collaboration
Choose Miro when you have 50+ users needing comprehensive collaboration infrastructure. Extensive integrations, massive template libraries, and proven enterprise scale make Miro the industry standard for large distributed teams.
For Structured Workshop Facilitation
Choose Mural when you're a professional facilitator running design sprints regularly. High-quality curated templates and specialized facilitation features support structured collaborative sessions better than general-purpose tools.
For Diagram-Heavy Technical Workflows
Choose Lucidspark or Creately when technical teams need both brainstorming and formal diagramming. Process documentation, flowcharts, and org charts require more structured capabilities than freeform creative whiteboards provide.
For Budget-Conscious Teams
Choose Kosmik, Conceptboard, or Whimsical when limited budgets constrain tool selection. Kosmik offers the most generous free plan with unlimited boards. Conceptboard delivers excellent value at €5/month with built-in video conferencing. Whimsical provides affordable all-in-one collaboration at $10/month.
Team Size Considerations
Solo or 1-3 People
Kosmik works best for individual visual thinking with optional collaboration. Whimsical provides fast simple collaboration for tiny teams. Ziteboard offers minimalist sketching without complexity.
Small Teams (5-20 people)
Kosmik scales flexibly for growing creative teams without forced complexity. Mural provides professional features without enterprise overhead. Lucidspark offers good value with solid collaboration capabilities.
Medium Teams (20-100 people)
Kosmik scales nicely with team collaboration features for creative and design-focused medium teams. Miro proves itself at this scale with reliable performance and comprehensive features. Conceptboard provides excellent budget-friendly option at €5/month with built-in video. ClickUp Whiteboards work perfectly if you already use ClickUp for project management.
Large/Enterprise (100+ users)
Miro sets the industry standard for enterprise-scale collaboration. Bluescape handles complex multi-month projects with advanced security. MS Whiteboard serves Microsoft-committed organizations with thousands of users.
Budget Decision Tree
Free Forever Options
Kosmik provides the most generous free plan with unlimited boards and core AI features. MS Whiteboard comes free with Microsoft 365 subscriptions your team may already have. Avoid Google Jamboard despite being free - it's shutting down soon.
Under $10 per user monthly
Kosmik Pro at $6.99 monthly (annual) or $10.99 monthly delivers exceptional value with unlimited AI features. Miro Starter at $8 monthly provides solid collaboration for growing teams. Conceptboard at €5 monthly offers affordable whiteboarding with built-in video conferencing. Whimsical at $10 monthly consolidates multiple document types in one affordable tool.
$10-20 per user monthly
Miro Business at $16 monthly scales for medium enterprises needing advanced features. Mural Team+ at $9.99 monthly and Business at $17.99 monthly support professional facilitation. Kosmik Team at $15 monthly (using Plus pricing of $10.99 as reference) adds advanced collaboration for creative teams.
Enterprise/Custom Pricing
Bluescape serves organizations managing complex long-term visual collaboration projects. Miro Enterprise and Mural Enterprise scale for Fortune 500 companies with thousands of users. Custom enterprise agreements provide dedicated support and SLA guarantees.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the best free alternative to FigJam?
Kosmik offers the most generous free forever plan among FigJam alternatives. You get unlimited boards and AI-powered features at no cost, unlike competitors limiting free users to 3 boards (Miro) or 1 board (Mural).
The Rover plan includes 1 workspace, up to 3 members, 10 guests, unlimited universes and items, 100 files (15MB each), and 50 AI requests monthly. Everything you need for individual creative work and small team collaboration without time limits or forced upgrades.
Microsoft Whiteboard comes free with Microsoft 365 if your organization already subscribes. Lucidspark offers a basic free tier with limited boards for individuals testing the platform.
Free plan comparison: Kosmik provides unlimited boards with AI features and no time limit. Miro restricts you to 3 editable boards only. Mural allows just 1 mural. FigJam limits you to 3 FigJam files requiring a Figma account.
Is Miro better than FigJam?
It depends on your specific needs and team context.
Choose Miro when you have large teams (20+ users) needing extensive integrations with 100+ apps. The massive template library with 5,000+ options and proven enterprise features justify higher costs. Best for complex multi-stakeholder projects requiring comprehensive collaboration infrastructure.
Choose FigJam when you prefer simplicity over feature breadth and already use Figma for design work. Small teams (5-10 people) benefit from FigJam's lower learning curve and straightforward interface. Good for quick simple brainstorming without setup complexity.
Choose Kosmik when you need deep visual thinking beyond basic brainstorming. Moodboards, creative research, and spatial organization with AI-powered features work better in Kosmik. Perfect for individual or small team flexibility prioritizing creative depth over collaboration breadth.
Feature comparison: Miro offers 5,000+ templates vs FigJam's 100+ and Kosmik's growing library. Miro provides 160+ integrations vs FigJam's 20+ and Kosmik's focused set. Miro and FigJam lack core AI features that Kosmik provides standard. Kosmik's free plan offers unlimited boards vs Miro's 3 and FigJam's 3 files. Miro starts at $8 monthly, FigJam at $12-16 monthly bundled with Figma, Kosmik offers free or $6.99 monthly.
Can I use FigJam without Figma?
Yes, you can use FigJam as standalone whiteboard tool without Figma design features. However, pricing remains bundled with full Figma subscription.
FigJam-only use still requires Figma account and Professional plan at $12-16 per user monthly depending on seat type. You can't separate FigJam pricing from full Figma subscription even when not using design tools. This limitation means you're paying for features you don't use.
Better standalone alternatives exist: Kosmik offers free forever or $6.99 monthly (annual) purpose-built for visual work without forced bundling. Miro provides $8 monthly Starter plan as dedicated whiteboard tool requiring no design software. Mural offers $9.99 monthly Team+ plan focused purely on collaborative whiteboarding.
Why this matters: If you only need whiteboarding without design tool capabilities, standalone alternatives provide better value. You avoid paying for unused Figma features while getting tools purpose-built for your actual whiteboard collaboration needs.
What's the difference between FigJam and Miro?
Core philosophy differs fundamentally between these two popular collaborative whiteboards.
FigJam emphasizes simple lightweight brainstorming as part of the Figma design ecosystem. Clean interface and basic features keep learning curves gentle. Best for small teams (5-50 people) doing straightforward collaborative sessions. Tight Figma integration benefits design teams already in that ecosystem. $12-15 monthly per user bundled with full Figma subscription.
Miro positions as comprehensive collaboration platform functioning as standalone product. Extensive features support complex enterprise workflows with 5,000+ templates and 160+ integrations. Proven at massive scale with teams of 1,000+ users. Steeper learning curve reflects more powerful capabilities. $8 monthly standalone Starter plan scales to $16 monthly Business plan.
Key differences: Miro provides 5,000+ templates vs FigJam's 100+. Miro offers 160+ integrations vs FigJam's 20+. Miro scales better for enterprise teams (100-1,000+ users) while FigJam suits smaller teams better (5-50 users). Miro requires more training time but delivers more powerful features. FigJam simplifies quickly but limits depth for complex workflows.
Learning curve: Miro demands steeper investment learning extensive features and capabilities. FigJam offers gentler onboarding with simpler more focused interface.
Which FigJam alternative is best for designers?
Kosmik stands out as best FigJam alternative specifically for designers because it's purpose-built for visual creative work rather than generic team collaboration.
Why Kosmik for designers: Moodboarding features support visual research and inspiration gathering workflows designers use daily. Rich media support handles images, web clips, PDFs, and videos all on one canvas eliminating app-switching. AI-powered organization helps connect visual concepts and find inspiration through similarity search. Spatial freedom on infinite canvas mirrors creative thinking rather than forcing linear organization. Personal workspace focus supports individual creative exploration before team collaboration begins.
Built-in browser (Press 'W') transforms designer workflows completely. Research inspiration directly on your moodboard canvas without losing context switching between browser tabs and design tools. Every reference, inspiration image, and web resource lives spatially organized where you're actually creating.
Other good designer options exist: Miro works well for large design teams (20+ designers) needing extensive template libraries and integrations with design tools. Good for design sprints and collaborative workshops with multiple stakeholders. Mural excels for design thinking facilitation when running structured design sprint methodologies with clients and teams.
Why not FigJam for designers: FigJam works excellently for quick collaborative sketching during meetings. But it lacks depth for serious moodboarding, visual research synthesis, and personal creative exploration. Designed primarily for team brainstorming rather than individual creative depth designers need for inspiration gathering and concept development phases.
Are there any open-source alternatives to FigJam?
Yes, several open-source whiteboard tools exist, though they generally offer fewer features than commercial options.
Top open-source options:
Excalidraw provides completely free open-source sketching and diagramming. Simple interface focuses on quick diagrams with hand-drawn aesthetic. Privacy-focused with data staying local on your device. Limited collaboration features compared to commercial platforms. Best for quick diagrams and privacy-conscious individual users.
tldraw offers open-source infinite canvas that's lightweight and fast. Embeddable in other applications for developers building custom tools. Basic collaboration capabilities without advanced features. Best for developers needing simple sketching embedded in products.
Draw.io (diagrams.net) delivers free diagramming with desktop and web versions. Extensive shape libraries support technical diagrams effectively. Limited whiteboard features focus more on structured diagramming. Best for technical diagrams, flowcharts, and network architecture visualization.
Limitations of open-source alternatives: Fewer templates and integrations reduce productivity compared to commercial options. Less polished user experience may frustrate non-technical users. Limited or no customer support when problems arise. Self-hosting requirements for some tools add complexity. Smaller communities provide fewer resources and shared templates.
When to choose commercial alternatives: Professional features, integrations, reliable support, and regular updates justify commercial tools like Kosmik (generous free plan), Miro, or Mural when teams need production-ready collaboration. Commercial options invest in UX polish, ongoing development, and dedicated support that open-source projects often lack.
Final Thoughts
FigJam has earned its popularity as accessible collaborative whiteboard tool. But it's not the only solution, and definitely not the best choice for every team and workflow.
For visual thinkers and creative professionals needing more than basic sticky notes and brainstorming, Kosmik reimagines digital whiteboarding as spatial canvas for thinking. AI-powered organization, rich media integration, built-in browser eliminating app-switching, and focus on individual creative work alongside collaboration make it standout choice for designers, researchers, and knowledge workers who need depth.
Get started with Kosmik and experience visual thinking workspace designed for how creative work actually happens. Zero app-switching, infinite spatial organization, AI-powered tagging, built-in browser for seamless research. Everything in one place, the way your brain works.

